Well, the BBC has responded… sort of… to their broadcast foretelling of the WTC7 collapse on 9/11. You can read it here.
Can you spot the bald-faced lies?
Lie #1 – Richard Porter of the BBC, says: “We didn’t get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn’t receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.”
They didn’t get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down? Soooo… what? They just make shit up then? They just make up news off the top of their heads and report it on live T.V. during one of the most tragic days in recent history? Come on! OF COURSE someone told them the building was going to fall. If they didn’t, then Richard Porter is admitting that the BBC makes up news to report live on the air.
Lie #2 – Porter says: “We did what we always did – sourced our reports, used qualifying words like ‘apparently’ or ‘it’s reported’ or ‘we’re hearing'”
Sorry Richard, that’s a LIE! The video above is introduced by the anchor thusly: “Now, more on the latest building collapse in New York. You might have heard a few moments ago, I was talking about the Salomon Brothers Building collapsing, AND INDEED IT HAS!” Do you see any qualifying words in there? Later, the same news anchor says: “Presumably there were very few people in the Salomon Building WHEN IT COLLAPSED.” Again, do you see any “qualifying words” there? What’s more, the news ticker on the screen, at 2:04 on the Google video that I posted in my previous blog entry, clearly states: “The 47 story Salomon Brothers building close to the World Trade Centre has also collapsed.” …nope! Still no “qualifying words.”
The BBC was, at no time in this video, reporting this as an unverified report. They were clearly reporting it as verified fact.
Lie #3 – Porter says: “We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I’d love to get hold of it.”
Huh? Not only does every major media outlet in the world make multiple, in house copies of every major news story they deliver, they also pay third party agencies to make multiple, off-site recordings of every second of broadcast, on THE MOST MUNDANE OF NEWS DAYS! Not to mention when a story like 9/11 is going down! They do this because their video archives are invaluable to them for further reporting on developing stories. The BBC would HAVE to have had multiple copies of every second of their broadcast over that entire day, stored in multiple facilities.
But, Richard Porter, head of BBC news, expects us to believe that due to a “cock-up” (his words) the BBC no longer has in their possession any copy of any of their broadcasts from that day. Uh, yeah, ooooook fine.
Richard Porter IS A LIAR!
So, in all of recorded history, a grand total of three steel framed skyscrapers have collapsed due to fire, all of them on the same day, and the BBC manages to perfectly predict one of them 20 minutes before it happened. When confronted with the smoking-gun proof of their incredible precognition, they spout a bunch of demonstrable lies, and apparently every single copy of every tape made of their broadcast on that day – one of the most archival days in human history – has, due to a “cock-up”, mysteriously gone missing.
But, of course, you’d have to be crazy to believe it could be anything more than a series of bizarre coincidences!
If the BBC’s got nothing to hide, then why didn’t they name their source for the report, Instead of insulting our intelligence by claiming that there was no source, and that they just make up news stories off the top of their heads? It’s not like they’re protecting Deep Throat or anything. It’s likely just a wire service. So, what was it? AP? Reuters? Agence France? What? Name it so people can get to the bottom of it and answer the questions! If there’s no conspiracy, why do they have to keep covering everything up with lies an evasions so that the conspiracy idea keeps getting perpetuated?
If there’s no conspiracy, then just be forthcoming with some straight-forward fucking answers, and we’ll put this whole damned thing to rest!
Anyway, Richard Porter – you sir, are a liar, a coward, and a fraud. Have a nice day.